Trump considers ending Iran conflict without new nuclear deal

Washington/Tehran: In a potential shift in U.S. policy, President Donald Trump is reportedly considering ending the ongoing conflict with Iran without requiring a new nuclear deal. According to reports, the key condition for this move would be ensuring the full reopening of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, which has been at the center of tensions between the two nations.

The situation remains complicated as Iran has laid out several demands in exchange for reopening Hormuz. These include lifting U.S. sanctions, ending military threats, compensating for damages caused by American and Israeli attacks, and removing the naval blockade imposed on Iran. Tehran’s demands have added layers to an already complex negotiation process.

Historically, Trump has maintained a tough stance on Iran’s nuclear program, but recent reports suggest his focus may now be shifting. The priority appears to be restoring normal shipping operations in the Strait of Hormuz and de-escalating the conflict, even without a new nuclear agreement. Trump has reportedly presented this option to his senior advisors, signaling a willingness to explore alternatives to military confrontation.

Iran, however, is not making it easy. Its demands go beyond reopening Hormuz, pushing for significant concessions from Washington. This has made any potential agreement more challenging, especially as direct talks between the two countries remain limited, with most communication happening through intermediaries.

Meanwhile, Trump has hinted at a strategy of reducing military actions against Iran while intensifying economic pressure. U.S. sanctions have already strained Iran’s economy, and Washington believes this approach could compel Tehran to make concessions. Trump described the current U.S. stance as “low-keying it,” suggesting a preference for economic tactics over military escalation.

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global energy corridor, facilitating the transport of a significant portion of the world’s oil and gas. Any prolonged disruption in this route could have serious implications for international energy markets and prices. As both nations weigh their options, the outcome of these negotiations could reshape the geopolitical landscape in the region. For now, the ball remains in both Tehran and Washington’s court.