Widow Alleges Son-in-Law Tried to Transfer Her Land Through Gift Deed

Son-in-Law Accused of Trying to Take Over Widowed Mother-in-Law’s Land Through Hibbanama

A sensational case involving an alleged attempt to take over a widow’s agricultural land has come to light. The woman has accused her son-in-law of taking advantage of their relationship and obtaining her signatures and thumb impressions on documents in the name of a land deal.

According to the allegation, the woman was told that a sale deed, or bainama, was being prepared for her land. However, she later came to know that a hibbanama, or gift deed, had allegedly been registered in the name of another person. The woman has alleged that the document was part of an attempt to take control of her valuable agricultural land.

Complaint to SSP Muzaffarnagar

The widow, a resident of Mundet Kalan village under Adarsh Mandi police station in Shamli district, submitted a complaint to the SSP of Muzaffarnagar. In the complaint, she alleged that Rahul, a resident of Mandwada village in the Budhana area, took her into confidence in the name of a land deal.

She alleged that on 16 May 2024, during documentation at a purported chamber located in Budhana tehsil, she was made to sign documents and place her thumb impression. The woman said she was told that the sale deed for the land was being completed.

She later allegedly discovered that the land had been transferred through a hibbanama in the name of another person. The woman has also alleged that, after this purported document-related activity, the land’s mutation, known as dakhil-kharij, was carried out with the alleged collusion of some employees of the tehsil.

The complainant has expressed suspicion of fraud and conspiracy. She has demanded an investigation into the documents connected with the land, the hibbanama and the mutation process.

Questions Over Court Orders

In her complaint, the woman referred to civil court case number 749/2026 and an ex parte order passed on 14 September 2026. She also questioned an alleged unilateral order obtained from the Budhana court on 21 October 2026 in connection with the land.

The woman has said that she was not given proper information about the entire judicial process. Her complaint raises questions about how the documents were prepared, how the land records were changed and how the court proceedings connected with the land moved forward.

The dispute has now allegedly reached the agricultural field as well. The woman has alleged that some parts of the standing sugarcane crop on her land were damaged. It has also been said that a complaint was submitted in this connection at Budhana police station.

The widow has expressed serious concern about the safety of her land and her life and property. Troubled by the continuing dispute and the alleged attempt to take possession of the land, she finally approached the SSP.

She has sought an impartial investigation into the entire matter, verification of the hibbanama and mutation documents, and legal action against those responsible. She has also requested that her safety be ensured.

The central question in the case is what the land documents actually show. The complaint raises the question of whether the woman was made to sign hibbanama documents in the name of a sale deed, or whether there is another fact behind the dispute.

The answers are expected to emerge only after an impartial examination of the documents and statements of the parties concerned.

This report is based on the written complaint submitted by the woman. The allegations have not been independently confirmed. The version of the person concerned and the official response from the police and administration will also be published when received.

Report by Anmol Kumar, Muzaffarnagar 7078215007